Archive for July, 2008

Entrepreneurs Aren’t Supplicants; Investors Aren’t Gods

I try, very hard most days, not to get my ass on my shoulders when faced with the arrogance that is too much a part of the culture of Silicon Valley.  Many entrepreneurs and investors have earned the right to puff up their feathers and parade their success in front of those who have not yet achieved their greatness.  Too many others mistake being lucky for being good.  It’s just a part of life in this plot of land we call home.

But just now, I couldn’t help myself.  You see, I’ve been working a diligent, intelligent, thoughtful guy who is taking on significant risk to his core business and family to bring an incredible (non-technology) product to market.  Having already built a successful alternative medicine practice, Ted Ray is commercializing his FlyRight anti-jet lag formlua.  The  product is amazingly affective and may well be the only reason I can log the air miles that I do without biting off the heads of small children.  In a few short months, Ted’s made tremendous progress with the business.  He’s developed sharp point-of-sale packaging, cut deals with several duty-free and travel retailers, and he’s even managed to get a product placement at a major celebrity event this Fall.

Now, he’s looking to raise a modest bit of capital, an endeavor new to him as it is to every first-time entrepreneur.  And, like every first-time fundraiser, he’s absorbed the rebuffs and jumped through the hoops of investors.  He is diligent and thoughtful in his follow up.  He is gently persistent.  He struggles to remain optimistic as he puts more of his own money into a business about which he passionately believes.

In the Spring, through an introduction I made, Ted exchanged e-mails and had a long phone conversation with an “angel” investor who invited Ted to re-connect after he’d navigated the maze of demands, objections, and “advice” the investor put before him.  In the intervening months, Ted focused on product distribution, scored a major marketing win, and signed on to a trial  with one of the largest travel retail outlets in the world.  Oh, and he rewrote his executive summary to the one-page format the “angel” demanded.  Then today, Ted accepted the offer to be back in touch and sent a polite message to the “angel.”  The “angel’s” response was nothing short of rude, self-important, and arrogant.  Lacking any sense of memory of the previous conversation, this “angel” responded with the neigh of a jackass.

It’s not the first time I’ve witnessed this sort of behavior.  Too many investors expect entrepreneurs to step and fetch, only to drag out a deal to which they are afraid to say “no.”  Maybe they come by that attitude honestly enough. When entrepreneurs behave as supplicants with begging bowl in hand, rather as than business people selling a piece of their company and the vision of what it can become, how could investors not become prideful of their role in the ecosystem?

But let’s not forget that without the entrepreneur, the investor doesn’t have much of a roll to play at all.  And it’s a small enough Valley that bad behavior doesn’t go unnotieced.  Suffice to say, this “angel” is off my referral list.

Comments (3)

BT Acquires Ribbit for $105Million

When I identified VoIP application platform provider Ribbit as one of the “DEMO 10,” I wrote:

My bet: Ribbit is gaining momentum among a range of established companies who need Ribbit’s platform to deliver integrated voice capabilities into their products, giving Ribbit big company potential; expect an IPO in several years time.

I was wrong. There’s no IPO in Ribbit’s future.  Just 6 months after the company rolled out the Amphibian platform at DEMO 08, the startup has been acquired by British Telecom.  The company is among the fastest from DEMO launch to acquisitions ever.

Don Thorson game me the heads up late last week that something was in the offing, and today the company, along with BT, made the official announcement.

Ribbit architected the platform for what the company called “the first Silicon Valley Phone Company.” A high ambition to be sure, and one that has now been legitimized by BT.  The open platform enables third-party developers to deliver VoIP applications that integrate communications services into a range of use cases.

While the $105M price tag may seem modest by some standards, it is a measure of the velocity with which Ribbit – and this emerging market are moving.  The company only emerged from R&D stealth about 8 months ago, and announced the applications platform at DEMO 08 in February.  That the buyer is a telco affirms the shift to IP-based communications and reinforces the vision of Ribbit’s founders that a new-generation of integrated voice services lies just ahead.

The acquisition is also good news for companies like PanTerra Networks that have been pushing similar architectures to enterprise customers.  An endorsement-by-acquisition of the sea-change in telephony can only support their work.

Comments (2)

Lest You Forget, It Is All About Me

I’ve been so heads down working on the DEMOfall conference (It’s going to be great, by the way) that I failed to realize what I chump I am.

All along, I’ve been using Twitter to keep an ear to the rail. I nurture my “following” list and am ceaselessly fascinated by the things people are doing, what they’ve discovered, and what they find necessary to share with a more or less anonymous world. Yes, I also use Twitter to keep a presence in the world; that way you all think I’m out and about when in truth I’m home watching So You Think You Can Dance (Will is going to win it, I’m sure of it. Update: In a measure of  my predictive abilities, Will was voted off the show just hours after I posted this column.).

Then yesterday, Twitter pukes and the relationship database goes haywire. Followers are mowed down by the hundreds. The hue and cry is deafening. “Where, oh where,” the Twitterati wail, “are all my followers?” Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (6)

To List or Not to List

I’ve been thinking about high school a lot lately. Specifically, the social hierachy of high school; how a certain portion of students are automatically anointed as popular due to athletic prowess and/or beauty. It’s the natural order of adolescence (at least it was in my day) – cheerleaders and football players = popular; geeks = not so much. It’s a precursor, really, to society at large. Generally speaking, there is a pre-determined hierarchy in most circles. Attention is paid to those who succeed financially, athletically, politically, or by sheer force of will (see Tila Tequila).

Sometimes, though, an entirely new sector of society is created in which there are no pre-determined rules. The members of that sector must establish hierarchies on their own and chaos invariably ensues, as people elbow for notice in whatever manner they see fit. The past few years have seen two such sectors brought into being: reality television and the blogosphere. The similarities between the two are striking when you think about it, but most notable is the manner in which “celebrities” in both worlds have risen to the top.

Now before I go any further, let me note one key difference between reality TV and the tech world: there are inordinately smarter people in the latter. The “A-List” in tech is comprised of people who’ve built successful companies on truly innovative ideas, people who can dig down into the trenches of coding languages and produce brilliant technologies used by consumers around the world. For the most part. There are also a few people on that list who would feel right at home on ‘The Real World’ or ‘Survivor.’ (You can tell how long it’s been since I’ve tuned into reality programming.) With no established rules as to what creates success, you’re invariably going to have some who push and scream their way to the top. Read the rest of this entry »

Comments (4)

In Search of a Non-Profit Exchange Network: Everything Old Could Be New Again

Buzz Bruggeman has lots of ideas, all of them offered with great enthusiasm, and some of them really rather good. The other day, he pinged me about a new post and it really is a good idea. A good idea that is the seed of a great idea.

In essence, Buzz wants to see the Shelfari book review site become a book exchange between individuals who read and value books and libraries that have limited budgets to acquire new texts. Libraries submit a wish list, and as readers complete a book, they review it on Shelfari, then send it on to the wanting library. To quote Buzz:

A friend of mine once told me that having a book shelf full books you had read was like having a six pack of empty wine bottles.

The book exchange idea recycles the “empties,” making a private resource a public one and, one can hope, encouraging literacy and other good things.

Certainly the technology to support such a book exchange is readily available. The LaLa.com platform, for example, supports trading of CDs by matching the recordings people want with the libraries that other people have. Not to underestimate LaLa’s algorithm, but how hard could it be to put that platform or one like it into a public site to support not just Buzz’s library idea (the good one), but also a need-matching concept (the great idea)? Why just stop at putting books in the hands of those who can’t afford or prefer not to buy them and thus rely on lending libraries. Why not match any gently used or excess goods with people and organizations that have a burning need for them.

Buzz’s idea works because the Shelfari site, in his example, creates the link between the have and the want, and perhaps that’s fundamental to making an exchange network function smoothly. But certainly there are other sites and organizations that could serve as a backbone for a trading network that re-distributes goods from those who no longer want or need them to those who do. Such a site gives new life to goods that have served their purpose yet have diminishing value to the original owner but high potential value to someone in need.

If this exchange network exists, I’d love to know about it. If it doesn’t, I’d love to see a few smart business brains figure out how to make it work.

Comments (2)